Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 42(5): 396-404, 2023 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2251784

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Respiratory viruses such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza, parainfluenza and human metapneumovirus are well-established etiologies of acute lower respiratory tract infections (ALRIs; LRI-viruses). In contrast, adenovirus (AdV), rhinovirus/enterovirus (RV/EV) and seasonal human coronaviruses (CoV), collectively termed AdV/RV/CoV, are detected both in healthy children and children with ALRI. METHODS: The methods include a prospective longitudinal case-control study, assessing the prevalence of LRI-viruses versus AdV/RV/CoV in ALRI [community-acquired alveolar pneumonia (CAAP) and bronchiolitis] during hospitalization (visit 1), 7-14 days (visit 2) and 28-35 days (visit 3) in 2-17-month-old children. Controls were 2-27-month-old children hospitalized for elective surgery during the same respiratory seasons. RESULTS: We enrolled 99 infants (37 CAAP, 38 bronchiolitis and 24 controls) and obtained 211 nasopharyngeal swabs. Overall, 163 (77%) had greater than or equal to 1 viruses detected; RV/EV (n = 94; 45%) and RSV (n = 71; 34%) were the most frequently detected viruses. In CAAP, the overall LRI-virus prevalence was 78.4%, 32.4% and 5.4% in visits 1, 2 and 3, respectively; the respective rates in bronchiolitis were 73.7%, 34.5% and 8.0%. In controls, no LRI-viruses were detected. In contrast, the overall AdV/RV/CoV prevalence was high among controls (70.8%) and similar among CAAP (48.6%, 40.5% and 40.5%) and bronchiolitis (47.4, 58.6% and 64.0%) across visits. CONCLUSIONS: Among ALRI cases, LRI-viruses dominated during the acute disease, with prevalence declining within 28-35 days, suggesting their causative role. In contrast, AdV/RV/CoV prevalence was similar during all 3 visits and in controls, suggesting that carriage of these viruses is common during the viral respiratory season. The current study is relatively small and of short duration; however, the findings are supported by other recent studies.


Subject(s)
Bronchiolitis , Pneumonia , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Respiratory Tract Infections , Viruses , Infant , Humans , Child , Child, Preschool , Prospective Studies , Case-Control Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Adenoviridae , Seasons
2.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 12(4): 198-204, 2023 Apr 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2286006

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Beginning in late 2021, we observed a significant increase in SARS-CoV-2 reinfections in pediatric patients evaluated at our institution. We aimed to characterize the children with SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, determine the number of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections, and characterize the intervals between two infections in our patient population. METHODS: From March 2020 to September 2022, we identified children ≤21 years old who had ≥2 SARS-CoV-2 infections using laboratory reports. We then defined the type of SARS-CoV-2 variant in the first and subsequent infections by mutation-specific typing or local epidemiology data. Clinical outcomes and the intervals between SARS-CoV-2 infections were assessed. RESULTS: We identified 541 children with ≥2 SARS-CoV-2 infections. The median interval between two infections was 229 days. The hospitalization rate was lower in the second infection. Reinfection counts were higher during the periods that Omicron variants predominated. Reinfection occurred more rapidly when Omicron variants were circulating with some occurring in less than 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: As SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, there is a need for ongoing surveillance to identify the frequency and time interval between reinfections and to re-evaluate the definition of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Child , Young Adult , Adult , Ohio/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Reinfection/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology
3.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 28(11): 2270-2280, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2089723

ABSTRACT

Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, different SARS-CoV-2 variants have been identified and associated with higher transmissibility than the ancestral nonvariant strain. During January 1, 2021-January 15, 2022, we assessed differences in clinical and viral parameters in a convenience sample of COVID-19 outpatients and inpatients 0-21 years of age in Columbus, Ohio, USA, according to the infecting variant, identified using a mutation-specific reverse transcription PCR assay. Of the 676 patients in the study, 17.75% were infected with nonvariant strains, 18.49% with the Alpha variant, 41.72% with Delta, and 16.42% with Omicron. Rates of SARS-COV-2/viral co-infections were 15.66%-29.41% and were comparable across infecting variants. Inpatients with acute Delta and Omicron infections had lower SARS-CoV-2 cycle threshold values and more frequent fever and respiratory symptoms than those with nonvariant strain infections. In addition, SARS-COV-2/viral co-infections and the presence of underlying conditions were independently associated with worse clinical outcomes, irrespective of the infecting variant.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Child , Humans , Adolescent , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Pandemics , Severity of Illness Index
5.
J Clin Microbiol ; 60(8): e0024122, 2022 08 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1879113

ABSTRACT

The COVID pandemic has put a spotlight on laboratory medicine, showcasing how vital diagnostic testing is for society and the health care system. It has also brought to light and accelerated the critical shortage of trained and experienced laboratory personnel that has been felt for decades. The need for laboratory professionals is expected to grow by 11% between 2020 and 2030, a higher rate of growth than the overall average for all other health care occupations. Here, the background to this workforce shortage is reviewed. Some proposed actions to help address the issue are put forth, including increasing awareness of the medical laboratory science profession along with bolstering training opportunities and awareness of alternate routes to obtaining certification as a medical laboratory scientist. In addition, recent survey data specifically related to the employee shortages in microbiology are presented which demonstrate that 80% of microbiology laboratories have vacant positions and that filling these positions is challenging for a number of reasons, including a lack of qualified applicants.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Laboratories , Medical Laboratory Personnel , Medical Laboratory Science/education , Pandemics
6.
J Infect Dis ; 225(2): 208-213, 2022 01 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1635423

ABSTRACT

The burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in children represents a fraction of cases worldwide, yet a subset of those infected are at risk for severe disease. We measured plasma severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA in a cohort of 103 children hospitalized with COVID-19 with diverse clinical manifestations. SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia was detected in 27 (26%) of these children, lasted for a median of 6 (interquartile range, 2-9) days, and was associated with higher rates of oxygen administration, admission to the intensive care unit, and longer hospitalization.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Infant , Intensive Care Units , Male , Nasopharynx/virology , RNA, Viral/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Severity of Illness Index , Viremia/epidemiology
7.
Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease ; 2021.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1602617

ABSTRACT

One SARS-CoV-2-positive sample demonstrated impaired detection of the N1 target by RT-PCR using US CDC primer/probe sets. A three nucleotide deletion was discovered that overlaps the forward primer binding site. This finding underscores the importance of continued SARS-CoV-2 mutation surveillance and assessment of the impact on diagnostic test performance.

8.
J Clin Microbiol ; 59(8): e0092621, 2021 Jul 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1494949

ABSTRACT

The emergence of more transmissible and/or more virulent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern (VOC) has triggered intensive genomic surveillance, which is costly and difficult to sustain operationally over the long term. To address this problem, we developed a set of four multiplex mutation-specific PCR-based assays with same-day reporting that can detect five VOC and three variants of interest (VOI), as defined in the March 2021 guidelines from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/). The screening results were compared to the whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and showed 100% concordance for strain typing for B.1.1.7 (n = 25) and P.1 (n = 5) variants using spike (S) mutation S-N501Y, S-E484K, and S-H69-V70del assays. The S-L450R assay, designed to detect the B.1.427/429 VOC, also identified multiple isolates of a newly emerging multiply mutated B.1.526.1 variant that is now rapidly increasing in the eastern United States. PCR approaches can be easily adopted in clinical laboratories, providing rapid screening methods to allow early detection of newly emergent variants and to efficiently triage cases for full genomic sequencing.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Mutation , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/genetics
9.
J Mol Diagn ; 22(8): 968-974, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-683077

ABSTRACT

Clinical molecular laboratory professionals are at the frontline of the response to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, providing accurate, high-quality laboratory results to aid in diagnosis, treatment, and epidemiology. In this role, we have encountered numerous regulatory, reimbursement, supply-chain, logistical, and systems challenges that we have struggled to overcome to fulfill our calling to provide patient care. In this Perspective from the Association for Molecular Pathology Infectious Disease Subdivision Leadership team, we review how our members have risen to these challenges, provide recommendations for managing the current pandemic, and outline the steps we can take as a community to better prepare for future pandemics.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pathology, Molecular , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Humans , Leadership , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Pathology, Molecular/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Societies, Medical , United States/epidemiology
10.
J Clin Microbiol ; 58(5)2020 04 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-209223

ABSTRACT

The QIAstat-Dx Respiratory Panel (QIAstat-Dx RP) is a multiplex in vitro diagnostic test for the qualitative detection of 20 pathogens directly from nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens. The assay is performed using a simple sample-to-answer platform with results available in approximately 69 min. The pathogens identified are adenovirus, coronavirus 229E, coronavirus HKU1, coronavirus NL63, coronavirus OC43, human metapneumovirus A and B, influenza A, influenza A H1, influenza A H3, influenza A H1N1/2009, influenza B, parainfluenza virus 1, parainfluenza virus 2, parainfluenza virus 3, parainfluenza virus 4, rhinovirus/enterovirus, respiratory syncytial virus A and B, Bordetella pertussis, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae This multicenter evaluation provides data obtained from 1,994 prospectively collected and 310 retrospectively collected (archived) NPS specimens with performance compared to that of the BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel, version 1.7. The overall percent agreement between QIAstat-Dx RP and the comparator testing was 99.5%. In the prospective cohort, the QIAstat-Dx RP demonstrated a positive percent agreement of 94.0% or greater for the detection of all but four analytes: coronaviruses 229E, NL63, and OC43 and rhinovirus/enterovirus. The test also demonstrated a negative percent agreement of ≥97.9% for all analytes. The QIAstat-Dx RP is a robust and accurate assay for rapid, comprehensive testing for respiratory pathogens.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Nasopharynx/microbiology , Nasopharynx/virology , Viruses/isolation & purification , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/instrumentation , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/instrumentation , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Retrospective Studies , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL